LEGISLATIVE DISCIPLINE IN THE NIGERIAN LEGISLATURE: A COMPARATIVE LENS

Abstract

This paper examines legislative discipline in the Nigerian legislature through a comparative lens, focusing on the constitutional and legal frameworks governing the discipline of lawmakers by legislative leadership. The study investigates whether prolonged suspensions align with the principles of natural justice and their implications for democratic representation and governance. It critically assesses the extent to which disciplinary processes uphold constitutional safeguards and whether such actions infringe on the rights of elected representatives and their constituents. The research aims to (1) analyse the legal basis for legislative discipline under Nigerian law, (2) evaluate adherence to procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings, (3) assess the impact of suspensions on democratic representation, and (4) explore the role of judicial intervention in legislative disciplinary matters. Using a doctrinal legal research methodology, the study employs a qualitative approach, examining constitutional provisions, legislative rules, judicial precedents, and comparative practices from jurisdictions such as the United States and the United Kingdom. The findings reveal significant gaps in transparency and procedural consistency, highlighting the need for reforms to prevent abuses of power and ensure compliance with the rule of law. The paper concludes by advocating for legal and institutional reforms to strengthen due process, enhance accountability, and align Nigeria's legislative disciplinary mechanisms with global best practices.